Into the frying pan or into the fire?

After five years of austerity and measures imposed by the Troika (a trio made up of the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank and the European Comission), the Greeks are finally asked to speak their minds.

The question is not whether they want to rescue the banks or whether they'd rather follow the example of Iceland. It is not whether they want to default or burden the taxpayers with an enormous debt that no sane person sees repaid within the century. It is not even whether the rich should bear the brunt or the common folk. All the above have already been decided upon and signed meekly by governments that acted submissively towards the Troika, in blatant disregard of Greek public opinion.
Then the tide turned and the resentment of ordinary Greeks brought a moderate left party to power in January.
The new government vowed to not rock the boat too much - they promised abide by what had been signed, provided the basic human rights and dignity for Greek citizens were not violated.
The Troika, mostly egged on by Germany, frothed in the mouth and, in order to lend us even more cash that would go directly to the banks, presented terms that would be impossible to agree upon. To most Greeks, it is evident that they want to force the issue and make the government choose between submission (which would discredit it to its electorate) or resignation (which would bring the more malleable previous parties to power again).
So the government did the only thing they could do: declared a referendum.
So, now, five years too late, the people are asked to decide their fate.
Unfortunately, their choices are limited:

YES would mean argeement to even harsher austerity measures, cuts of pensions and salaries, abolition of the most basic working rights, collapse of the Health Care System, rise of taxes and many others that will effectively drive more people into poverty and strangle the economy, making the current depression even worse. After voting YES, the Greeks will be unable to protest, since they will have given their consent to their own pauperisation. However, given that austerity has brought depression, revenue to pay the debts will never be generated, and the Greeks will be forced to take even more loans just to keep from defaulting, pushing the country into debt even more. This debt will haunt Greeks for generations to come.

The flag reads "yes."

NO would mean that Greeks would rather not receive another "dose" of cash to repay loans if that would mean more of the same austerity that has seen poverty rise to levels not seen since the 50's and 40's. Denied of their dues, the banks will of course push (and have proven that they can) for harsh punishments for Greece, in order to deter others from doing the same. Cash will dry up and Greece will not be able to import fuel, medications and many other necessities. It is possible that hard years will follow for all but the richest.

The helmet reads "IMF", the forklift reads "NO."

So what will the Greeks vote?

Innundated by fear-mongering propagated by the majority of the media (affiliated with the older parties and a few rich Greek families) many people will vote YES, for fear of losing what little they have. Recipients of pensions, those who still have some savings in the bank or are still making a living wage are more prone to this fear. Others, belonging to the right and centrist parties will vote YES in the hope to receive some financial security in the form of jobs in the public sector, if they come again into power. To put it simply, yes will be voted by people who will be content to gnaw the bones thrown under the table by their masters, fearing what might happen if they ever crawl from under that table.

Those who have felt the bite of poverty, who have lost their jobs, who have moved in with their parents because they cannot afford their own flat, who have queued for soup kitchens, who have lost their homes or businesses because they were unable to pay their debts, those who are homeless, will vote NO. They will be joined by others, who fear that a YES will forfeit the future of their children and perhaps their grandchildren too. To put it simply, NO will be voted by people who see the current situation as nothing short of slavery and want out.

What will be the result?
This is a lose-lose situation.  The Greeks are squeezed between a rock and a hard place. Whichever way they jump, they'll suffer.

If they vote NO, the government will be in a better position to re-negotiate new terms with teh Troika. They might listen, or not. In the latter case, Greece will default, and Greeks risk immediate collapse of the economy, dire poverty and who knows what else. It's possible that there will be black marketing and deaths due to lack of medical supplies.
If they vote YES, the poverty and dying will be less acute, but will steadily worsen and go on for a longer (possibly much longer) period of time.

If they vote NO, the government will win, but it will shoulder the responsibility for the problems and the social unrest that will follow.
If they vote YES, the government will have to resign, meaning the return of the older parties, who will, as before, meekly say yes to the harsh measures dictated by the Troika.

If they vote NO, the Greeks will be guilty of countless deaths brought on by lack of medical supplies and fuel for heating. This has already been happening ever since the crisis started, but a default will cause acute shortages for a -hopefully-short period of time.
If they vote YES, the Greeks will be guilty of exactly the same, only over a much longer period of time. The IMF itself has admitted that the Greek debt is unpayable, so Greeks will be condemned to bondage for decades to come.
To all this misery and certain deaths, we should add the possibility of social unrest - whichever way the vote is cast.

My vote
Although I have almost made up my mind that it's better to look at the long-term picture and take the plunge, I will still approach the booth with trepidation. I fear my own ignorance and my own fear. Naturally I don't have all the pieces of the puzzle, and I'm seeing only part of the picture. Am I oversimplifying? Am I condemning my children and my family to a quick and brutal death instead of holding out, in the hope that things may get better? How many people is my vote going to condemn to misery or death, whichever way I cast my vote? How many may be saved if I vote otherwise?

One last thought
The only thing that takes me out of my fear (and preemptive guilt) is this thought:
The people who planned this future and put these choices before us seem not to have spared a single thought for the human beings involved in their decisions.

And that drives me mad.


--------------------------------------------

First image from here: http://greece.greekreporter.com/files/Greece_referendum.jpg. Other images variously, via Facebook. Original sources unknown.

My data comes from these sources:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2015/07/03/the-next-greece-is-not-a-matter-of-if-but-when/?postshare=2281435956127960
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/former-central-bank-head-karl-otto-poehl-bailout-plan-is-all-about-rescuing-banks-and-rich-greeks-a-695245.html
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/07/03/how-europe-played-greece
http://jubileedebt.org.uk/reports-briefings/briefing/six-key-points-greek-debt-weeks-election
http://www.theguardian.com/business/live/2015/jul/02/greek-debt-crisis-athens-creditors-referendum-yes-no-live
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-07-01/europe-wants-to-punish-greece-with-exit

This is not a toy: The Greek Tragedy told with Playmobil figures

5 / 32

Showing image 5 of 32

Blogger Nikos Papadopoulos repurposes Playmobil's toy figures to create darkly witty tableaux that comment on the reality of modern day Greece. And as with all good satire, not everyone is happy with the outcome, not least the German toy-maker itself that sought to remove his images from the internet.

A ‘happy father, unhappy Greek,’ is how Nikos Papadopoulos describes himself on his blog, now known as ‘Plasticobilism’ (Facebook page here). As a good father he first started purchasing Playmobil toys for his young son. As an unhappy Greek he soon realized that the small plastic men, women and children could be repurposed to create images with a political message, to say the things he wanted to say more playfully and more effectively than with any long-winded political diatribe.



Thus was born ‘Playmobilism’ the first blog and facebook page Mr Papadopoulos, an astrophysicist and professional screenwriter, created in August 2013 to post images of his new found toy-based activism. With its clever and topical posts, the page soon built a significant and devoted following. 

That was until March 25th - ironically Greece’s independence day - when Mr Papadopoulos’s Facebook page was suddenly taken down without warning following a complaint made by Playmobil Germany to the social media site. The company maintained that the page and blog violated its intellectual property rights by using the name ‘Playmobil’. 



That may seem reasonable. But the company did not stop there. When Mr Papadopoulos set up a new blog and Facebook page under the new name ‘Plasticobilism’ (which while less satisfying, carefully avoids trademark issues), the company was still not happy. Writing to Mr Papadopoulos they stated that he was still violating their guidelines which prohibit the ‘modification’ of their figures in order to make ‘political statements’ and ‘aggressive content dealing with war and violence’. They demanded that he either shut down his page or remove all of the photographs with ‘political content’ (a broad term if ever there was one) and not post such images again.

Mr Papadopoulos refused, protesting that he couldn’t be violating any modification guidelines given that he was not modifying the store-bought figures in any way, only posing them. Furthermore, he pointed out, he was far from the only person on the planet who had thought of using Playmobil’s figures in such a way. He says he spoke to similar groups abroad who claimed that they had never been troubled by the company over any of their (equally political) content. The company also received angry emails from a number of Mr Papadopoulos’s followers and the story of censorship of a Greek blogger by a German multinational was picked up by several Greek news sites.


Angela Merkel arrives in Greece


Fortunately, for whatever reason, Playmobil eventually decided to back down and reached a compromise with Plasticobilism, retracting its demand that Mr Papadopoulos remove images and asking only that he publish a disclaimer on his sites clearly stating that he is in no way affiliated with the company, which he did. They even apologised for closing his first site. 

So for now we commend Playmobil for doing the right thing - albeit only after it behaved like an authoritarian behemoth. For given that Playmobil is designed for kids to ‘recreate and experience the world in miniature’, can't adults be trusted to do the same? Especially given that it is efforts like Plasticobilism, with its replacement of impotent rage with potent satire, that make the real world that little bit better. 

 Pavlos Zafiropoulos

Republished from here:  http://www.thepressproject.net/article/60300/This-is-not-a-toy-The-Greek-Tragedy-told-with-Playmobil-figures